Google celebrates Mexican Painter Frida Kahlo’s Birthday

Posted July 6th, 2010 by Reg825 and filed in Art
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Add a Comment

I had to save this picture for posterity:

googleFrida 300x211 Google celebrates Mexican Painter Frida Kahlos Birthday

I think this is one of the coolest logo doodles that Google has ever done.  Just genious. 

Here’s a few links of the coverage it received:

Los Angeles Times

The Guardian

The Advocate

New York Daily News

ABC News

Here’s a list of previous Google doodles.

PS: have you seen the movie yet? Salma Hayek did great job playing Frida.

Update: here’s a cool list of Frida quotes. Here’s my favorite:

They are so damn `intellectual` and rotten that I can`t stand them anymore….I [would] rather sit on the floor in the market of Toluca and sell tortillas, than have anything to do with those `artistic` bitches of Paris.

Logos: emotional connections vs. purely intellectual ones

Even if you are not a fan of Obama, you can at least recognize (or at least I hope you do) that the logo his campaign used during his run for the presidency was enormously effective at communicating the images and narratives his campaign was trying to push.  I mean, just look at it:

The logo reinforces the Obama campaign's slogans of "hope" and "patriotism" with a clear sun rising over a field.

The logo reinforces the Obama campaign's slogans of "hope" and "patriotism" with a clear sun rising over a field.

As the blog “Here Comes The Science” described back in February of last year, http://www.herecomesthescience.com/2008/02/06/the-genius-of-the-obama-campaign-logo/ in the logo:

  • The O represents Obama and he can use the logo without his name next to it. He’s claiming the O as George W. Bush claimed the W
  • The blue O and the red stripes represent the flag
  • The red stripes represent the plains, the American farmland
  • The O’s whitespace represents the sun, shining over the plains. Because it’s white, it evokes sunrise, not sunset.
  • By comparison, the other candidates’ logos or emblems did not have a similar level of depth or amount of symbolic connections that Obama’s logo was making with whoever saw the logo.  Essential, Obama’s logo was commnicating a lot more (hope, patriotism, change, sunrise, fields-and by extension hard work via allusions to ’working the land’, etc. without actually using those exact words-just imagery-the only actual text that this logo has is ”Obama 08″). 

    More than anything, I think this points to something that a lot of people (even in political circles) do not understand about marketing an “image”: that images, symbolism, and appeals to emotion are much more powerful than making purely intellectual dry-factual ones.  A hybrid of the two is always more powerful of course: making appeals that are first and foremost based on emotional connections but that have factual-based arguments to back up the messaging is of course preferable.  However, that doesn’t take away from the power of an appeal that connects with an audience in a more immediate, visceral way.

    Related Posts with Thumbnails