• National News
  • Latin America
  • In Your State
  • Communications Management
  • Community Organizing
  • Volunteer Opportunities
Project Economic Refugee News analysis, communications management, community organizing, and volunteer opportunities engaging Latinos
  • About
  • What are economic refugees?
  • How to talk immigration
  • History
  • Newsmedia Center
  • Contact
  • RSS Feed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Progressive Marriage: Gay & Immigrants’ Rights

By
Reg825
– November 10, 2010Posted in: National News
Download article as PDF

 

When Ricky Martin first came out and admitted publicly that he was gay, people seemed to have a couple of  interesting reactions: they either seemed to blow it off with a ”is that a surprise?” attitude or they argued that “a person’s sexuality shouldn’t matter anyway.”  While those two positions might have some validity to them, what many seemed to miss was the enormity of what Ricky Martin’s coming out meant to the acceptance of homosexuality in the Latino culture.  For the first time ever, a major Latino star with mass cross-over appeal had come out and had put an uber-public face to being gay.  Many gay Latinos immediately recognized the magnitude of the situation.  In many ways, the President of the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation Jarrett Barrios had it right: Ricky Martin’s decision to come out represented a “game changer”; Barrios expressed during an interview he gave to PopEater that:

Ricky coming out is a game changer for many gay and transgender Latino children, who for too long have not had many out gay people to look up to. It’s also a game changer for their mothers, aunts and grandmothers, who were once teenage girls screaming at Menudo concerts. They now have a face to the word “gay” and know a father of two who just happens to also be gay. As more and more people get to know gay and transgender friends, neighbors, family members and celebrities, they come to know that our community wants the same things all people do: to be accepted, valued for our contributions and equal chance to raise our families and take care of our loved ones.

Being gay in Hispanic culture can be very difficult, but it is probably not much different from other cultures, as Ricky Martin pointed out during his interview with The View:

Yet, what most people continue to miss in all this is the larger dynamic of how the state of gay rights intersects strategically with an issue that is near and dear to Latinos: immigrants’ rights.  There are many places where the two camps intersect, most visibly in story after story of gay and lesbian U.S. citizens that are married to or have a civil union with an undocumented Latino or Latina that is going through a deportation proceeding.  There are many instances of such stories, the latest of which to be publicized is the story of a Brazilian man facing deportation even though he is married to a man that is a U.S. citizen. 

Most people tend to not go beyond just the need for immigration reform that is inclusive of LGBTQ rights and thus miss deeper dynamics at play in how the two camps, immigrants and gay rights, sometimes function within silos that isolate them from one another at their own peril.  There is no question that much education needs to happen among the Latino community regarding gay rights.  Gays come in many colors and shapes, and for many individuals an issue does not exist in a silo but is rather compounded with others in real life situations like with the repeal of the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy that prohibits gays to serve in the U.S. military.  Just take the example of Omar Lopez, a sailor that was discharged from the U.S. Navy because of his sexuality; for him, the issue of being Latino and being gay are not mutually exclusive.  Here he is telling his story in Spanish:

…and here’s a video of him in English trying to re-enlist at the Army recruiting center after Don’t Ask Don’t Tell was ruled unconstitutional:

Again, there is no question that much work is needed to sensitize the Latino community in the arena of gay rights.  Yet, hardly anyone talks about the need for education within the gay community regarding immigrants’ rights.  Some have recognized this issue and have featured some attempt at tackling the issue, like with the example of the LOGO cable channel that caters to the LGBTQ communtiy featuring Latino Beginnings, a documentary highligting the status of gay Latinos as “a minority within a minority” or like with gay civil rights hero Lt. Dan Choi coming out in support of immigrants’ rights on the DREAM Act.  While there are many gay folks that support and empathize with undocumented immigrants’ plight because of a shared experience of discrimination, there also many that have staunch hardline anti-immigrant views.  I have come across a few in my time in person and online, and during the recent failed attempt to move forward the DREAM Act and Don’t Ask Don’t Tell on the Defense Reauthorization Act, we saw a few in the LGBTQ community actually blaming failure of passage of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell on the DREAM Act.  In fact, after Republicans blocked passage of both the DREAM Act and Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, I got the following message on twitter derisively calling the DREAM Act the “Scheme act” (I’ve blacked out this person’s twitter handle to protect his privacy):

Gay Anti DREAM Act 300x200 Progressive Marriage: Gay & Immigrants Rights

Such an attitude, of course, has no basis on logic, because the same could easily be done on the reverse: blaming failure of passage of the DREAM Act on Don’t Ask Don’t Tell … but that’s exactly my point: pitting one groups’ advocacy rights against the other or blaming each other for shortcomings in outcomes makes no strategic sense.  What’s even more tragic is it was apparent that this person did not know that conservatives (starting with Newt Gingrich) were already spreading propaganda blaming the DREAM Act not passing on the effort to pass Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.        

If we are to succeed at tackling the humanitarian crisis that is taking place on our Southern border and achieve gay rights, we cannot ignore the disturbing trends of mutual discrimination between the two communities.  Furthermore, we cannot, whether deliberately or not, continue to have blackouts of each camp’s key moments in the advancement of their aspirations, as was the case when Don’t Ask Don’t Tell completely eclipsed the DREAM Act in media coverage, leaving the DREAM as a mere afterthought, even in progressive media outlets.  If we continue to turn a blind eye and pretend that these problems do not exist, those that seek to divide us will exploit those weak links. It is imperative that we strengthen the progressive alliance between gay rights and immigrants’ rights in this country to battle regressive neo-conservative ideology that constantly seeks to usher in even more racist hard line laws against immigrants and more homophobic discriminatory policies targeting gays. 

Fact is, right-wingers are already trying to divide the two camps, just look at what the example of how supporters of Carly Fiorina tried to do with a Spanish ad campaign demonizing Barbara Boxer for her support of gay rights.  If it hadn’t been for Latinos exposing Fiorina for her support of Arizona’s neo-nazi SB 1070 law, she might have just ended up pulling off an upset victory.  In the new political reality that we live in, Latinos have proven to be a swing voting block that can decide elections for either party and by the same token, it can decide outcomes on issues as complex and contentious as gay rights.  By the same token, comprehensive immigration reform is an equally contentious issue and immigrants’ rights activists will need as many allies as they can muster in order for immigration reform to pass, particularly in the current absence of a centralized progressive communications network that could even begin to counter Fox News’ anti-immigrant fervor.  In the end it is as simple as this: together, we can rise, or together we can fall because, as I mentioned previously, it takes a community to fight despair; it’s our choice.

So what do you think? We all know homophobia exists in the Latino community, but why is it that hardly anyone talks about xenophobia or even racism in the Gay community?

pixel Progressive Marriage: Gay & Immigrants Rights
Tags: cable channel, coming out, discrimination, DREAM Act, Gay Latinos, Hispanic attitudes, homosexuality, immigrants' rights, LGBTQ, logo, machismo, Ricky Martin, The View

About Reg825

Refugio “Reg”, founder of Project Economic Refugee, is a Los Angeles-based PR Specialist and Online Organizer with a background in community organizing and Integrated Communications Management.
  • Dominick Antonucci

    Yes and no.

    Come on. The issue of ‘immigration’, by which you mean that there ought to be a change to the law so that those who have broken the laws suffer no consequence, and 2) that there should be no laws of immigration has NOTHING to do with gay rights.

    Nothing.

    The ‘latino community’ needs to understand that gays are not perverted and disgusting, and that we are deserving of the same rights as straight people. To the extent that they’re not on board, they’re no different than any other people who are against us.

    The ‘latino community’ has an overly narrow ‘macho’ model for what being a man means. They need to work on that.

    I do believe that there are countries. I don’t think that I can just go to any country in the world and say, “Hi, I’m here, make me a citizen.” I don’t agree with our laws because they don’t make sense. I think that citizenship should have no relation to place of birth, but, instead the nationality of one of the parents.

    Those who live their childhood here can become citizens if not the case that possible through the nationality of either of their parents. (Britain, other countries.)

    BUT — anchor babies — no way. I see it in my work. I teach ESL at college level. I have students who were born and lived in US for 3 months who are now here to learn English as 20 year olds. They are no more American than any foreigner visiting the US on vacation, yet they are under the law, American.

    The real problem is the ‘schizophrenia’ about immigration — which isn’t hard to understand. Capital likes cheap workers. So, if the government were serious, it would just be the case that employers employing those working illegally under immigration to pay enormous — HUGE — fines. This signal will cause them to change their behavior. Keep making the signal louder until it does. This would work. This is never brought up because politicians of both parties want to avoid pissing business off.

    About in state tuition. Maybe — maybe not. Let’s bear in mind that many working and living here illegally under immigration laws are (illegally) avoiding income tax. To remind — the public universities are paid for by the public though income tax — to some degree.

    The REAL question is why is Mexico a place from which so many countless people wish to leave. We put no pressure on Mexico to move away from a bifurcated society with the consequence that the poorest come here just to survive. It’s a gross injustice, but never gets called out. Worse, the Mexicans themselves have decided that we’re the bad ones which we’re not nor ever have been.

    Finally, as far as English is concerned — Look, if you’re serious about being an American, you learn English.

    I’m offended by the suggestion that it’s a mark of being progressive to be for repealing all laws of immigration and announcing to the world that physical presence in the US constitutes the basis of citizenship. Such a position makes citizenship completely meaningless.

    The true progressive — and I am one — would point out that the immigration of poor people willing to work for cheap has just increased the ranks of the poor in total and among actual citizens. This is commonsensical and has been evidenced by research showing that the wages of unskilled blacks in the us and their unemployment has increased as the number of Mexican immigrant replacements has increased over past period of time.

    Furthermore, the ‘safety valve’ of US immigration means that there’s less pressure than there otherwise would be to cause reform in Mexico. Clinton negotiated away all of the progessivity that could have been available under NAFTA. Basically, that agreement merely meant that US companies could move their operations south of the border to better exploit workers. The provisions that would have demanded first world standards at the workplace were thrown out — so much for ‘the third way’. Just like now, a blank sheet of paper was handed to the Republicans after the Dems did a lot of meaningless ‘huff and puff’ and hand wringing.

    So, no, the silly economists were again wrong that there would be any increase in the standard of living in Mexico where such facilities were built — so much for the economists. Those workers continue to live on wages far less than the ones workers whose factories were moved enjoyed. Also, the environmental degradation is not checked by our level of national regulation.

    Not helping matters is the trend among Mexican couples to chose to have more children than can be afforded, if the living standard is to be middle class, which means college.

    Point is that none of this discussion turns on gay rights at all. I do think that, as Catholic, there’s a strong chance to appeal to the conscience of Mexicans as to how gays are regarded and treated. I’m optimistic about this, and wouldn’t be surprised if progress in gay rights south of the border is faster than here. Nevertheless, the issue of immigration has no connection.

  • On Twitter
  • Links of Interest
    • Personalcashadvance.com - careers
  • Favorite quote from the Bible:
    “When an alien resides with you in your land, you shall not oppress the alien. The alien who resides with you shall be to you as the citizen among you; you shall love the alien as yourself, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God.”
    -Leviticus 19.33-25

  • Support the Project
  • Literature/research using "economic refugee" term
    • American University International Law Review: unprotected in the U.S. by virtue of an inaccurate label
    • Change.org: When an Undocumented Immigrant Is an Economic Refugee
    • Huffington Post: Surge in Economic Refugees Will Test Community Resources
    • MinnPost.com: Americans living abroad for financial survival
    • New York Times: American Evangelical Churches Announce New Policy of Sanctuary for Iraqi Refugees
    • PDA: Economic Refugees and Big Petroleum
    • The Guardian: Casualties of globalism
    • Tikkun Daily: Reagan’s Refugees
    • Univision News Tumblr: Call Marco Rubio what you will, just don’t call him an “economic refugee”
    • UPROOTED: Refugees of the Global Economy
  • Tags
    air america AlterNet Arizona Chris Matthews CNN CurrentTV dailykos Democrats DREAM Act Ed Schultz election Election Fraud environment fox news George Lakoff Harry Reid Heal the Bay Immigration immigration reform Keith Olbermann Latinos Latino vote LGBTQ Los Angeles Lou Dobbs Meg Whitman msnbc Obama President Obama progressive Project Economic Refugee's Zeitgeist Corner Rachel Maddow racist Republicans Sarah Palin SB 1070 Sonia Sotomayor Tea Party Video vote
    Powered by SEO Tag Cloud
  • Alexa Rank

About Arras WordPress Theme

Copyright Project Economic Refugee. All Rights Reserved.